Violation reports
How to report terms violations, copyright issues, impersonation, and problematic content.
Violation and copyright reporting on Pixlinker
1. What reports we accept
- copyright claims, lack of publication rights, or copyright infringement reports,
- reports of impersonating a person, brand, or creator,
- reports of photos that violate the law, privacy, image rights, required consent rules, or platform policies,
- reports of terms violations, including hate, spam, scams, realistic AI-manipulated or generated content suggesting a real person’s involvement without consent, and illegal content.
2. How to submit a report
2.1. Reports may be submitted through the indicated contact channel or a reporting form, if available. The fastest way is the "Report" option available next to content.
2.2. In your report, provide information that allows the content or action concerned to be identified, such as a link to the content, the type of violation, a description of the situation, contact details, and whether you report missing rights, consent, or an image-rights breach.
2.3. For copyright claims, also provide the legal basis, a statement that you are acting in good faith, and whenever possible documents or context confirming your rights.
2.4. Intentionally submitting false or misleading violation reports is prohibited.
2.5. Abuse of the reporting system may result in account feature limitations or moderation actions.
2.6. A report should contain information that allows the problem to be identified, in particular a link, a description of the violation, justification, and any available evidence or supporting materials.
2.7. An incomplete report may prevent the case from being reviewed or may extend the time required for verification.
2.8. The operator may ask for additional information where needed to understand the report, verify rights, or assess risk.
3. Report verification
3.1. The operator may temporarily hide content while the report is being reviewed.
3.2. The operator may request additional information, documents, proof of copyright, licenses, or required consents needed to clarify the case.
3.3. When needed, the operator may contact both sides of the dispute to gather context, evidence, and confirmation of rights or consents.
3.4. The operator makes reasonable efforts to review reports as efficiently as possible, but does not guarantee review within a specific time.
3.5. The operator may limit the scope of feedback if disclosing details would violate privacy, security, correspondence secrecy, the interests of other users, or applicable law.
3.6. Decisions may be made manually, automatically, or using moderation-support tools, including technical, anti-spam, anti-fraud, or content analysis tools.
4. Possible decisions
4.1. After reviewing a report, the operator may find no violation, hide content, limit its visibility, label content, remove content, limit account features, block the account, or refer the case for further review.
4.2. Decisions may be temporary or final, depending on the scale and type of violation.
4.3. The scope of information about a decision may be limited due to privacy, security, correspondence secrecy, abuse prevention, or applicable law.
5. Appeal
5.1. A user affected by a moderation decision may submit an appeal through the indicated contact channel or form, if available.
5.2. Appeals are reviewed by the operator or a moderator, and the result may uphold, change, or revoke the previous decision.
5.3. Appeals are reviewed within a reasonable time depending on the complexity of the matter and the data available, without any guarantee of a fixed SLA.
5.4. An appeal should include a description of the matter, justification, and information or materials that may help reassess the decision.
